Many papers in the midwest reported on Friday that the NAS recommends against
Army Corps plan for locks and dams.
The Army Corps of Engineers has not adequately justified the need for a
multi-billion dollar plan to expand locks and dams on the upper Mississippi
River, according to a National Academy of Sciences report released
yesterday.
Here is a press release that you could use as the basis for a letter to the
editor responding to the above story.
Press Release from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
December 1, 2003
For Immediate Release:
Contact: Mark Muller, 612-870-3420, [log in to unmask]
Ben Lilliston, 301-270-4787, [log in to unmask]
Simple Steps Could Improve Mississippi River Barge Traffic, New Report
Corps Should Consider Cheaper Alternatives With Immediate Benefits
Minneapolis - By implementing small-scale, low cost measures, the efficiency
of barge traffic on the Mississippi River could be significantly improved,
according to a new report by the University of Missouri-St. Louis' Center
for Transportation Studies. The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
(IATP) commissioned the report to explore low cost alternatives to improve
barge traffic efficiency on the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterways
(UMR-IW).
Currently, the Army Corps of Engineers is considering a number of alternatives
to improve the navigation system on the UMR-IW, including a controversial
$2.1 billion lock expansion project that will take more than 20 years to
complete.
"More immediate, cheaper alternatives to improve Mississippi River navigation
should be utilized before a massive lock expansion project is considered,"
said IATP's Environment and Agriculture Program director Mark Muller. There
are several transportation sectors that effectively use advancements in global
positioning systems and communications technology to reduce costs. The barge
industry s reliance on federal subsidies reduces innovation while also distorting
the agricultural transportation market.
The Corps collects and maintains operational data regarding the locks along
the UMR-IW, and those data show significant waiting times at certain locks
during certain times. There is no coordination with the arrival of barges
at various locks. This first come, first serve system can create significant
back ups.
The report, "Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterways: How to Reduce
Waiting Times of Vessels While Using the Current Infrastructure" by David
Ronen, Ph.D. and Robert Nauss, Ph.D., finds that regardless of whether the
locks are expanded, transportation logistics management makes sense. The
report makes a series of recommendations including:
· Implementing an appointment system where
barges would be assigned appointed times to pass through the locks. This would
work in congruence with Global Positioning System (GPS) technology and would
enable tows to reduce fuel costs by adjusting their traveling speed;
· Offering barge operators price incentives
(discounts) to use the system during low demand periods or penalizing (charging
a premium price) operators for using the system during peak periods;
· Re-evaluating the small-scale measures
considered by the Corps in 1999, given recent technological advances.
IATP is simultaneously releasing its report, "Technology We Have vs. Money
We Don't: How to Avoid Sinking $2.1 Billion into the Mississippi River." The
report argues that lock expansion could actually increase transportation costs
and that there is little reason to believe barge traffic will rapidly expand
on the UMR-IW system any time soon. The report uses Corps data to show a
wide variance in the time it takes tows to pass through the locks - with
some tow companies consistently fast and others consistently slow. This indicates
that training, experience, and the use of technology within the barge industry
could significantly improve traffic efficiency on the river.
Both reports can be found at: www.iatp.org/enviroag.
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy promotes resilient family
farms, rural communities and ecosystems around the world through research
and education, science and technology, and advocacy.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp