I don't want to try to speak for all of the group showing a "lack of interest" in the upcoming elections, but here are my thoughts: I find this whole "takeover"deal really distasteful, and I really want to keep it from happening. I suspect pretty much everyone agrees with me on that. I don't want to spend a ton of time on the web trying to get information about it, I just want someone to identify who the "good" and "bad" candidates are (which has pretty much already been done on this listserve, although it would be a good idea to repeat it), and make sure I get a form on which to vote. If someone can help me with that, before the election, then I assure you I will be voting to keep the club as is, and not let it be hijacked out from under us. If there is something else that I/we need to be doing, please let me/us know what that is, and I'll try to help with that too. Mike Wyrick On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:59:09 -0600 Bill Witt <[log in to unmask]> writes: > Dear Sierra Friends, > > I'm puzzled by what appears to be a considerable lack of interest in > the > upcoming BOD elections. Only three of the 94 members on this > list-serve > have responded to my expressions of concern. > > Others, however, are taking note. Here's a list of newspapers that > today > published an AP story on the takeover effort. > > Bill Witt > > > > > USA Today > Kansas City Star > Seattle Times (ran with their own story that had local interviews) > Sarasota Herald-FL > Salt Lake City Tribune > Chicago Tribune > Boston Globe > Miami HeraldContra Costa Times-CA > Fort Wayne Journal Gazette-IN > Fort Wayne News-Standard-IN > Grand Forks Herald-ND > Belleville News-Democrat-IN > Atlanta Journal-Constitution > Providence Journal-RI > Corvallis Gazette Times-OR > Tri-Valley Herald-CA > Wichita Eagle > Wilkes Barre Weekender-PA > Bradenton Herald-FL > Rocky Mount Telegram-NC > Columbus Ledger-GA > Centre Daily Times-PA > News Journal-TX > Fort Worth Star-Telegram > The Guardian-UK > MLive.com > KTVU.com-SF > Biloxi Sun Herald-MS > San Jose Mercury News-CA > phillyburbs.com-PA > Wilmington Morning Star-NC > Dayton Daily News-OH > Macon Telegraph-GA > Akron Beacon-Journal-OH > The Ledger-FL > Tuscaloosa News-AL > > Rival factions compete to control powerful Sierra Club > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) ? A fierce battle is brewing over the future of > the > Sierra Club, and an unlikely issue is at the center of the debate: > immigration. > A growing faction in the nation's most influential environmental > group has > urged a stronger stance against immigration, calling the growing > U.S. > population and its consumption of natural resources the biggest > threat to > the environment. > > Past and present Sierra Club leaders say the anti-immigrant faction > has > teamed up with animal-rights activists in an attempt to hijack the > 112-year-old organization and its $100 million annual budget. > > "At stake is really the heart and soul of the organization," said > Adam > Werbach, the club's president from 1996-98. "It's a sad attempt by a > very > small special-interest group to take over the entire Sierra Club > organization." > > Some of the old guard has organized a movement called Groundswell > Sierra > to oppose what they say is an attempted takeover by outside groups. > Their > opponents responded by filing a lawsuit claiming the leaders are > unfairly > trying to influence an upcoming board election. > > Between March 1 and April 15, members will cast mail-in ballots to > fill > five open seats on the club's 15-member governing board. The club's > anti-immigration faction says it needs only three more seats to > control > policy. > > "It's a democratic process. To accuse these candidates of taking > over the > Sierra Club is like accusing the Democrats of taking over the White > House," said board member Paul Watson, who co-founded Greenpeace and > now > heads the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. > > Groundswell Sierra was formed after club leaders learned that > Watson, who > won a seat as a petition candidate last year, spoke openly about a > takeover attempt during a speech at a conference on animal rights. > Animal > rights activists have agitated for the club to denounce hunting, > fishing > and meat consumption. > > Club leaders say the anti-immigration debate has drawn in outsiders > who > want to promote their agenda. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a > Montgomery, Ala.-based civil liberties group, has reported that > extremist > racist and anti-immigration groups are encouraging their members to > pay > $25 to join the Sierra Club and vote in the election. > > In January, center co-founder Morris Dees said he would run for a > board > seat to draw attention to the anti-immigration movement. > > Groundswell Sierra is encouraging members to vote because less than > 10% of > the club's 750,000 members have participated in recent elections, > making > it easy for candidates to win board seats with relatively few votes. > > Founded by Scottish immigrant John Muir in 1892, the San > Francisco-based > Sierra Club, the country's oldest and largest environmental group, > has > traditionally advocated for clean air and water and protection of > wildlands and wildlife. > > Despite its swelling ranks ? membership has grown by 50% over the > past > decade ? the Sierra Club hasn't had much success at achieving its > top > priority these days: stopping what members believe is an assault on > the > environment by the Bush administration, said executive director Carl > Pope. > > "This administration has played by a different set of rules," Pope > said. > "If you don't play by the normal rules, you can do a lot of damage ? > even > in three years." > > Immigration came to the fore in recent years as some members pointed > out > that the United States consumes more natural resources than any > other > country. The debate came to a head in 1998, when members voted by a > 60-40 > margin to remain neutral on immigration. > > But the issue has not gone away. In recent elections, several > members who > favor tighter curbs on immigration have been elected to the board. > > "Many environmentalists are not willing to deal with this very > important > issue," said board member Ben Zuckerman, a UCLA astronomy professor > who > co-founded a network of club activists called Support US Population > Stabilization. "The numbers need to come down. Legal and illegal > immigration are at record-high levels." > > Many club leaders say an anti-immigration stance would alienate > members as > well as allied progressive groups that represent immigrants and > minorities. > > "The Sierra Club is an inclusive organization," said Groundswell > spokesman > Lawrence Downing, the club's president from 1986-88. "If the Sierra > Club > adopted an anti-immigration policy, you've lost your constituency > and your > credibility." > > In an unusual move last month, all 13 living former club presidents > sent a > letter to the board demanding action to protect the club and endorse > the > candidates nominated by the board. > > Last week, the three most prominent candidates supported by the > anti-immigration faction filed a lawsuit against the Sierra Club, > seeking > to bar the organization from using club resources to back certain > candidates. > > Board President Larry Fahn called the lawsuit an attempt to "muzzle > the > leadership." > > Watson and his allies, meanwhile, say the group's ruling elite is > simply > afraid of losing power. > > "I think there's a group that's trying to protect their turf," said > David > Pimentel, a candidate supported by the anit-immigration faction. > "They > want to run it their way from the inside." > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: > [log in to unmask] > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask]