Dear Sierra Friends,

I'm puzzled by what appears to be a considerable lack of interest in the
upcoming BOD elections.  Only three of the 94 members on this list-serve
have responded to my expressions of concern.

Others, however, are taking note.  Here's a list of newspapers that today
published an AP story on the takeover effort.

Bill Witt




USA Today
Kansas City Star
Seattle Times (ran with their own story that had local interviews)
Sarasota Herald-FL
Salt Lake City Tribune
Chicago Tribune
Boston Globe
Miami HeraldContra Costa Times-CA
Fort Wayne Journal Gazette-IN
Fort Wayne News-Standard-IN
Grand Forks Herald-ND
Belleville News-Democrat-IN
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Providence Journal-RI
Corvallis Gazette Times-OR
Tri-Valley Herald-CA
Wichita Eagle
Wilkes Barre Weekender-PA
Bradenton Herald-FL
Rocky Mount Telegram-NC
Columbus Ledger-GA
Centre Daily Times-PA
News Journal-TX
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
The Guardian-UK
MLive.com
KTVU.com-SF
Biloxi Sun Herald-MS
San Jose Mercury News-CA
phillyburbs.com-PA
Wilmington Morning Star-NC
Dayton Daily News-OH
Macon Telegraph-GA
Akron Beacon-Journal-OH
The Ledger-FL
Tuscaloosa News-AL

Rival factions compete to control powerful Sierra Club
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) ? A fierce battle is brewing over the future of the
Sierra Club, and an unlikely issue is at the center of the debate:
immigration.
A growing faction in the nation's most influential environmental group has
urged a stronger stance against immigration, calling the growing U.S.
population and its consumption of natural resources the biggest threat to
the environment.

Past and present Sierra Club leaders say the anti-immigrant faction has
teamed up with animal-rights activists in an attempt to hijack the
112-year-old organization and its $100 million annual budget.

"At stake is really the heart and soul of the organization," said Adam
Werbach, the club's president from 1996-98. "It's a sad attempt by a very
small special-interest group to take over the entire Sierra Club
organization."

Some of the old guard has organized a movement called Groundswell Sierra
to oppose what they say is an attempted takeover by outside groups. Their
opponents responded by filing a lawsuit claiming the leaders are unfairly
trying to influence an upcoming board election.

Between March 1 and April 15, members will cast mail-in ballots to fill
five open seats on the club's 15-member governing board. The club's
anti-immigration faction says it needs only three more seats to control
policy.

"It's a democratic process. To accuse these candidates of taking over the
Sierra Club is like accusing the Democrats of taking over the White
House," said board member Paul Watson, who co-founded Greenpeace and now
heads the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.

Groundswell Sierra was formed after club leaders learned that Watson, who
won a seat as a petition candidate last year, spoke openly about a
takeover attempt during a speech at a conference on animal rights. Animal
rights activists have agitated for the club to denounce hunting, fishing
and meat consumption.

Club leaders say the anti-immigration debate has drawn in outsiders who
want to promote their agenda. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a
Montgomery, Ala.-based civil liberties group, has reported that extremist
racist and anti-immigration groups are encouraging their members to pay
$25 to join the Sierra Club and vote in the election.

In January, center co-founder Morris Dees said he would run for a board
seat to draw attention to the anti-immigration movement.

Groundswell Sierra is encouraging members to vote because less than 10% of
the club's 750,000 members have participated in recent elections, making
it easy for candidates to win board seats with relatively few votes.

Founded by Scottish immigrant John Muir in 1892, the San Francisco-based
Sierra Club, the country's oldest and largest environmental group, has
traditionally advocated for clean air and water and protection of
wildlands and wildlife.

Despite its swelling ranks ? membership has grown by 50% over the past
decade ? the Sierra Club hasn't had much success at achieving its top
priority these days: stopping what members believe is an assault on the
environment by the Bush administration, said executive director Carl Pope.

"This administration has played by a different set of rules," Pope said.
"If you don't play by the normal rules, you can do a lot of damage ? even
in three years."

Immigration came to the fore in recent years as some members pointed out
that the United States consumes more natural resources than any other
country. The debate came to a head in 1998, when members voted by a 60-40
margin to remain neutral on immigration.

But the issue has not gone away. In recent elections, several members who
favor tighter curbs on immigration have been elected to the board.

"Many environmentalists are not willing to deal with this very important
issue," said board member Ben Zuckerman, a UCLA astronomy professor who
co-founded a network of club activists called Support US Population
Stabilization. "The numbers need to come down. Legal and illegal
immigration are at record-high levels."

Many club leaders say an anti-immigration stance would alienate members as
well as allied progressive groups that represent immigrants and
minorities.

"The Sierra Club is an inclusive organization," said Groundswell spokesman
Lawrence Downing, the club's president from 1986-88. "If the Sierra Club
adopted an anti-immigration policy, you've lost your constituency and your
credibility."

In an unusual move last month, all 13 living former club presidents sent a
letter to the board demanding action to protect the club and endorse the
candidates nominated by the board.

Last week, the three most prominent candidates supported by the
anti-immigration faction filed a lawsuit against the Sierra Club, seeking
to bar the organization from using club resources to back certain
candidates.

Board President Larry Fahn called the lawsuit an attempt to "muzzle the
leadership."

Watson and his allies, meanwhile, say the group's ruling elite is simply
afraid of losing power.

"I think there's a group that's trying to protect their turf," said David
Pimentel, a candidate supported by the anit-immigration faction. "They
want to run it their way from the inside."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]