| Subject: | Endorsements for Sierra Club elections |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:48:09 UT |
| From: | "ProjectUSA" <[log in to unmask]> |
| To: | [log in to unmask] |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Endorsements
for Sierra Club elections
Issue 182: March 5, 2004 +== TIME-OUT PROJECT ==+
To be an environmentalist is, essentially, to be moral. The environmentalist explicitly removes him or herself from the egotistic "center of the universe" and acknowledges the simple reality that the "other" ( the environment, the community, nature, future generations) exists, and is an end in itself. Acting in accordance with such acknowledgement is the definition of morality. Thus environmentalism is a moral cause. But, because morality is such a complex and intangible business, environmentalism (unlike, say, physics) is always going to be especially susceptible to the quirks of fashion, folly, and human ignorance.
The current leadership of the country's largest environmental organization, the Sierra Club, is a good example of this danger, having failed in its duty to keep the Club true to its moral commitment to the environment and future generations. Here's what happened: Back during the diversity-is-our-strength heyday of the 1980s and 1990s, the prevailing social climate made race and ethnicity the central arbiter of every question of human ethics, and the primary determinant of all moral values.
The leadership of the Sierra Club, perhaps understandably, succumbed
to the zeitgeist and subordinated the Club's moral mission of
protecting and preserving the environment to the moral mission
of multiculturalism and diversity; it sacrificed the extremely
important cause for which the Club was founded The most damaging result was the Club's 1996 declaration that it
would discontinue its traditional and environmentally sensible
opposition to mass immigration
But even if it were true that a private association of concerned American environmentalists could have a significant impact on global environmental policies, the Club leadership employs a false dichotomy in presenting the population growth issue as an either/or, local vs. global, issue. There is nothing to prevent one from taking a principled position opposing the damage done by human population growth both globally and domestically. In other words, it is possible to regret the obliteration of the silver-backed gorilla (a victim of Nigeria's poverty and the pressures of a 3.3 percent annual population growth rate) while simultaneously regretting the permanent obliteration of 70 percent of California's original vegetation (a victim of prosperity and the pressures of a 2.1 percent annual population growth rate).
In explaining their abdication of the Club's responsibility to confront
the number one cause In short, Carl Pope and the Sierra Club leadership have purposely and consciously subordinated the moral cause of environmentalism to the moral cause of ethnic and racial diversity. So, while the Sierra Club impotently fritters away time and resources chasing the environmentally irrelevant goal of making white people a smaller percentage of the Club's membership, mass immigration will double the population of the United States within the lifetimes of today's children.
Supersize
America: Does it make sense for environmentalists to want to limit
immigration? (Grist Magazine) A
reality check for the Sierra Club (Denver Post) The Environmental
Movement's Retreat from Advocating U.S. Population Stabilization
(1970-1998): A First Draft of History (Roy Beck and Leon Kolankiewicz;
.pdf file) +== TAKE POSITIVE ACTION ==+
Here is another way you can help
When the Sierra Club election comes near, I look forward to your email letting ProjectUSA members know which candidates support immigration control and which don't. As I am sure you are aware, many people (including myself) are politically aware, yet lack the time to keep up with the seemingly endless attacks on the fabric of our country. I rely on and support organizations including ProjectUSA to keep me informed, so the letters, phone calls, and contributions I make are focused and effective. Jordan Lee
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
copyright 2004
How do I discontinue my membership/subscription to this e-mail list? Do not respond to this e-mail for any reason. To discontinue your membership automatically, please follow the link below. You joined this list as Concerned Friend at the following e-mail address: [log in to unmask]. You must use the correct e-mail address to discontinue your membership. If you experience any technical problems and/or do not receive confirmation that your request has been completed online, please postal mail, phone or fax your request using the contact information listed above. Your request will be processed within 10 days of the receipt of your request.