> > Position of MRCC on Supporting Clean Renewable > Energy and Opposing New Coal > > Burning Power Plants > > > > The MRCC urges the Sierra Club to formally > undertake a campaign to move the > > United States away from dependence on dirty energy > sources, and toward clean, > > renewable forms of energy utilization. This would > primarily entail > committing > > additional resources for: 1. Opposing new coal > burning power plants, which > > provide a cheap source of electricity, but at an > extremely high cost to > health > > and the environment, (except when they would > result in a net decrease in > > pollution). 2. Promoting efficiencies in > electrical generation, and end-use, > > and 3. Encouraging clean renewable energy. > > > > The burning of coal has led to severe pollution > and compromised human health > > and the environment. Many people are dying each > year in the U.S. from the > > health impacts of coal-fired pollution. Nearly > every one of the lakes, > > rivers and streams in the Midwest carry warnings > for women of child bearing > age > > to restrict their consumption of fish due to > mercury contamination, Nitrogen > > oxides from power plants contributes substantially > to the ozone problem that > > sickens millions of citizens, half of whom are > children, ever summer. > > Particulates from coal fired plants that are 30 to > 50 years old and have not > > been subject to New Source Review aggravate health > problems that include > heart > > disease, cancer and respiratory impairments . And > dangerous combustion > wastes > > are piling up in huge landfills that threaten > drinking water supplies. > > > > Coal burning power plants are the major sector > contributing to global > warming, > > emitting over 700 million tons of carbon dioxide > annually in the Midwest > > alone. Emissions from these facilities contribute > significantly to acid rain > > and smog as well. They also emit numerous > hazardous air pollutants such as > > mercury, lead, and arsenic. Many of these > pollutants travel long distances > and > > contribute to deteriorating air quality and > polluted waterways hundreds of > > miles away. > > > > Now that many proposals for new coal-burning power > plants have emerged and > are > > accelerating, it seems even more important than > ever that the Sierra Club > > address this reality. The expansion of this > industry will continue and > > flourish, unless the Sierra Club and other > organizations present a strong > > position advocating for a reduction in energy > consumption, against the growth > > of coal-fired plants, and for clean and safe > alternatives to generate > > electricity . > > > > Such alternatives include: > > > > ... Conservation in the use of electricity - Even > a modest reduction in > > consumption, which can be achieved through > increased efficiency of appliances > > and equipment, will virtually eliminate all need > or rationale for building > new > > coal-burning power plants > > ... Improved efficiency of electricity generation > sources in addition to > > electrical appliances and equipment. > > ... Public policy support and incentives for > implementing wind, solar, and > > other forms of clean renewable energy for > generating electricity and other > > societal uses. > > > > By opposing new coal burning power plants, huge > long-term investments of > > society's capital into polluting, non-renewable > sources of energy will be > > avoided. > > > > We consider this position to be consistent with, > and in concert with the > > resolution adopted at the May Council of Club > Leaders meeting, which called > on > > the Club to adopt a concise, comprehensible and > comprehensive American Clean > > Energy Policy. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask]