Tragic, isn't it, that our state is playing such a large role in this
environmental disaster.

Maize (corn, Zea mays) is not an Iowa native plant, but is native to Mexico,
where it is being gentically contaminated with transgenes from imported US
corn.

Tom

Don't be intimidated  by Bushites. Speak out! Remember, only you can prevent
fascism.

Subj:   GMW: Bush suppresses GM crop warnings - Leaked report acknowledges
genetic threat
Date:   10/18/2004 3:54:33 PM Central Standard Time
From:    [log in to unmask] (GM WATCH)
Sender:    [log in to unmask] (GM WATCH)
To:    [log in to unmask] ([log in to unmask])




GM WATCH daily
http://www.gmwatch.org
------
"The recognition of real environmental risks of GE maize and the consequent
recommendation to mill US maize upon entry into Mexico will clearly damage the
US position in its WTO case against Europe. It is no wonder they worked so
hard to try to prevent its release."
------
Bush suppresses GM crop warnings
Leaked report acknowledges genetic threat
Mon 18 October 2004
MEXICO/Mexico City
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item%5fid=617830

Monsanto and the US Government have been telling the world that genetically
modified crops pose no contamination threat to natural indigenous species. But
Greenpeace has learned from a leaked report that NAFTA disagrees and is
recommending steps to avoid a genetic threat to natural maize in Mexico. Surprise,
surprise: the Bush Administration is attempting to suppress the report.

The report, written by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) of
the North American Free Trade Agreement (US, Canada and Mexico) recommends
that all genetically engineered (GE) maize imports be labelled as such and that
all US maize entering Mexico should be milled upon entry, to prevent living
seeds from being planted intentionally or accidentally.

The Bush Administration has intervened several times to delay the publication
of the report -- completed three months ago -- and there is still no official
date for its publication.

The scandal began in September 2001 when the Mexican government announced
that scientists had discovered contamination of indigenous varieties of maize
with genetically engineered (GE) varieties. The likely source of the
contamination is imported maize from the USA.

Indigenous and local communities in Oaxaca were horrified, and
non-governmental environmental organizations in Mexico started a campaign to bring the
contamination to the attention of the world.

As the genetic home of maize, Mexico is on the forefront of natural diversity
in the crop. There are hundreds of local and wild varieties of Mexican maize,
all of which could be marginalised and overtaken by aggressive GE strains.
Loss of these varieties would put the world's food security at risk since
farmers rely on these genetic resources to create new varieties, especially ones
adapted to changing environmental conditions.

One of the first things Mexico did was to request the CEC to look into the
matter. The CEC began a process to investigate the contamination; possible
impacts on human health, communities, and the environment; and eventually to
provide recommendations to the three NAFTA governments on how to address the
contamination. The CEC finished the long-awaited report on the contamination of
Mexican maize by US GE maize way back in June.

"The recognition of real environmental risks of GE maize and the consequent
recommendation to mill US maize upon entry into Mexico will clearly damage the
US position in its WTO case against Europe. It is no wonder they worked so
hard to try to prevent its release," said Doreen Stabinsky, genetic engineering
campaigner for Greenpeace International.

There are at least two reasons why the US might want to delay publication of
a report that highlights the environmental, human health and socio-cultural
risks of GE maize. First, inside sources have alluded to the potential
implications of the report on the WTO case being brought by the US and Canada against
the European Union.

In 2003, the U.S., Canada and Argentina launched a case against the European
Union for a de facto moratorium on new approvals on GE varieties in place in
Europe since 1998. The CEC report is likely to provide strong support for
Europe's scientific arguments. It calls attention to the huge gaps in knowledge
that exist regarding the impacts of GE maize in Mexico, stating explicitly that
risk assessments carried out in the United States are not adequate to determine
potential impacts in Mexico.

"The WTO suit was clearly a politically motivated attack on the environment
and on European consumers. It is highly significant that another trade body has
now confirmed that there are unique risks to genetically engineered organisms
and that there is scientific backing for a precautionary approach on genetic
engineering," said Stabinsky. "The only appropriate next step for the US
government is to follow the CEC's recommendations and mill their maize exports."

The report will also clearly have an effect on the current US efforts to send
GE maize as food aid. A number of African countries have rejected whole US
maize as a potential threat to their environment, and requested only milled
maize. The report backs up these demands as it concludes that there is
insufficient data on which to conclude safety of transgenic maize for the Mexican
environment and recommends milling of maize to reduce these risks.

What Bush doesn't want you to see:

Conclusions from the CEC Mexican Maize report (unoffical English translation)
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618472/0/fina
l_cec.pdf

The CEC report on GE maize contamination in Mexico (Spanish)
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618468/0/cec_
maize_report_sp.pdf

Confidential comments from US and Canadian governments on the CEC report.
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618471/0/Come
ntarios_USA_24_jul_2004-1.pdf
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618470/0/EC_C
anada_opiniones.pdf

In-Depth:

The CEC advisory group - who are they?
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618045/0/advi
sory_group_members.pdf

History of the CEC report on Mexican maize
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/618081/0/CEC_
media_backgrounder_final.pdf

Mexican Maize: the Truth
http://weblog.greenpeace.org/ge/archives/001404.html#001404

The CEC's scientific findings on Maize contamination in Mexico
http://weblog.greenpeace.org/ge/archives/CEC_Report_Mexico_CornContamination_J
une2004.pdf

CEC website
http://www.cec.org/maize/index.cfm?varlan=english

Maize Under Threat - GE Maize Contamination in Mexico
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/multimedia/download/1/302811/0/maiz
eunderthreat.pdf





----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe simply click the link below:
http://www.gmwatch.org/unsub.asp?ID=1097&sec=pbmhh

This message has been sent because you subscribed to the GM Watch List.
http://www.gmwatch.org


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/