> Jim, It might've been slipped into the legislation by Farm Bureau when we weren't looking--probably because we were distracted by battles over phosphorus standards, artificially lowered water tables, air quality sampling, and gobs of other things. I wonder if counties that find the annual provision annoying could petition for a rule change that would allow them to adopt the matrix on a five-year basis? Bill Witt When I received word that Woodbury county was not on the list, I > contacted our supervisors. OOPS, forgot we had to do this every year. > WHY should the state complicate this process by demanding county action > EVERY year. > > Jim Redmond > Professor of English > Briar Cliff University > 712-279-5544 > [log in to unmask] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jane Clark > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 1:47 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: 86 counties sign up for master matrix > > IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES > February 10, 2005 > > 86 COUNTIES ADOPT MASTER MATRIX TO OVERSEE LOCATIONS OF ANIMAL > CONFINEMENTS > > DES MOINES - The final count of 86 Iowa counties formally adopting a > resolution to use the master matrix remains about the same for 2005 as > it was in 2003 and 2004. > > Counties use the master matrix to evaluate proposed locations of animal > confinements that are required to apply for construction permits. > > Allamakee County adopted the resolution for the first time in 2005. > > The complete list of counties that have adopted a resolution follows: > > Adair, Adams, Allamakee, Appanoose, Audubon, Benton, Black Hawk, Boone, > Bremer, Buchanan, Buena Vista, Butler, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Cedar, > Cerro Gordo, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Clarke, Clay, Clinton, Crawford, > Dallas, Davis, Delaware, Des Moines, Dickinson, Dubuque, Emmet, Fayette, > Floyd, Franklin, Greene, Grundy, Guthrie, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, > Harrison, Henry, Howard, Humboldt, Ida, Jackson, Jasper, > Jefferson, Johnson, Jones, Keokuk, Kossuth, Linn, Louisa, Lucas, Lyon, > Madison, Marion, Mills, Mitchell, Monona, Monroe, Montgomery, Muscatine, > O'Brien, Osceola, Page, Palo Alto, Pocahontas, Polk, Pottawattamie, > Poweshiek, Ringgold, Sac, Scott, Sioux, Story, Tama, Taylor, Union, Van > Buren, Wayne, Webster, Winnebago, Winneshiek, Worth and Wright. > > Counties can use the master matrix to evaluate the potential > environmental and social impacts of confinement operations that need a > construction permit before building, expanding or modifying the > operation. > > Before producers in participating counties can be approved for > construction, they must earn points on the master matrix for choosing > sites and using practices that reduce adverse impacts on the environment > and the community. > > A copy of the master matrix is available on the DNR Web site at > www.iowadnr.com under animal feeding operations. > > For participating counties, the resolution is in effect during the > remainder of 2005 and during January of 2006, but the county must > evaluate the master matrix for all confinements that are required to > submit construction permits. > > A map of the participating counties and more information can be found > on the DNR Web site at http://www.iowadnr.com/afo/matrix.html. > > For more information, contact Tammie Krausman at 515-281-8382. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship > e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's > latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent > editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/ > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: > [log in to unmask] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To get off the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask]