----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: Congress/Energy: Sierra Club Statement On Senate Energy
Hearing
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 18,
2005
CONTACT: Brian O'Malley, 202-675-6279
Proposed Senate
Energy Bill Does Nothing To Lower Our Dependence On Oil
Statement by
Dave Hamilton, Director, Sierra Club's Global Warming and Energy
Program
"Like the Energy Bill recently passed by the House, the
Inhofe Refinery
Bill (S.1772) being argued today in the Senate’s
Environmental and Public Works Committee does not propose real, productive
solutions to our current energy problems, and instead offers more handouts to
the oil and gas industries. This bill is based upon the false premise that
rising gas prices and America’s oil dependence can be solved by removing
environmental safeguards. The reality is, from 1975 to 2000, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received only one permit request for a new
refinery. Oil refineries are not being built because the industry doesn't want
to build them -- not because environmental laws are holding them
back.
"This winter, home heating bills are expected to reach record
highs, and
will create a real hardship for many Americans who are already
struggling with high gasoline prices. Rather than offer real solutions to
lower energy bills and cut America’s dependence on oil, the Republican
leadership in Congress is trying to exploit this crisis by preparing legislation
that will waive environmental laws for new refineries, open the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge and our coastlines to oil and gas drilling, and funnel even more
taxpayer dollars to the oil industry.
"Congress is again focusing on
losing, recycled solutions to solve our
energy problems. They have an
opportunity to instead lay out a vision for a new energy future that will save
consumers money at the gas pump, cut America’s oil dependence, and curb the
heat-trapping pollution that causes global warming. Congress must
significantly increase fuel economy standards for cars and light
trucks. Making our cars, SUVs and other light trucks average 40 mpg
would save more oil than we currently import from the Persian Gulf or could ever
get from the Arctic Refuge. It would also save the average driver $4,000
at the gas pump over the lifetime of the vehicle. In addition, Congress
should do the same thing with regard to the 55% of American families that heat
their homes with natural gas, and institute aggressive energy efficiency
programs for our buildings and industries, as well as a renewable energy
standard for electric
utilities."
# # #