The Sierra Club is once again searching for outstanding nominees for the
Goldman Environmental Prize, also known as the "Nobel Prize for the
Environment." The issues that prize winners address are diverse, from
protecting rivers and forests, to working to stop toxic industries in
disadvantaged communities, to assisting indigenous people in preserving
their environments and traditional ways of life. Each winner receives an
award stipend of $125,000. For more information visit www.goldmanprize.org.




                                SIERRA CLUB
         2008 GOLDMAN ENVIRONMENTAL PRIZE NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS

                      Deadline Friday, April 20, 2007

Thank  you  for  serving  as  a  Sierra  Club  nominator  for  the  Goldman
Environmental  Prize.  Goldman Prize staff relies heavily on its nominators
to identify appropriate nominees for the Goldman Prize. The information you
submit  in  your  nomination  is the sole determinant as to whether Goldman
Prize  staff  will  research  the  nomination  further. To ensure that your
nominee  fits  the  profile  of  a possible Goldman Prize recipient, please
refer  to the guidelines/criteria (p. 5) that staff and jury members use in
selecting Prize recipients.

IMPORTANT:  Prior  to  submitting  your  nomination, please contact Stephen
Mills  ([log in to unmask]  or  202-675-6691) with the name(s) of
the individual(s) you intend to nominate.

Nomination  instructions  change  each  year,  so  please use the following
format  for  your  nomination. Nominations should be typed and must include
the information indicated under all of the following headings.

1.    Identification of Nominee

    Include  the  full  name (with last name underlined or in bold), street
    address,  city  and  country,  home  and  work  telephone  numbers, fax
    number/s  and  email  and  web  addresses if available. Please note any
    alternate  names  by  which  they  may  have been known (married names,
    nicknames,  alternate  spellings  of  names  translated  from non-Roman
    scripts, etc.).


2.      Identification of Nominator/Researcher

    Please  include  your  own name, address, and telephone number. Include
    fax  and  email  address. Please indicate the date of the nomination as
    well.


3.       Short  Summary  of  Environmental  Achievement  (no more than four
sentences)



4.   Detailed  Description of Recent Environmental Achievement (three pages
    in 12pt font)

    Describe the outstanding environmental achievement of the nominee, with
    a  focus  on  current accomplishments. Please include specific dates of
    accomplishments (years). Please use the following subheadings:

· The nature of the problem(s) or issue
· How the nominee addressed the problem(s) or issue using grassroots
methods
· Results of nominee’s work
· Controversy surrounding or concerns about nominee’s work or circumstances
· Hardships and personal risks faced by the nominee (optional)
· Sensitive background information that could be exposed by greater media
attention (if the nominee is selected to win the Prize)
· Why this accomplishment is significant on a national and/or international
level


5.      Background Information on Nominee (two paragraphs or less)

    Briefly describe the nominee's current occupational affiliation and job
    title  (if  applicable), level of education completed, past involvement
    with  environmental  issues  (if  any), and other awards or recognition
    received  by the nominee, including the year(s) the award(s) were given
    (if  known). If possible, please include a copy of the nominee’s resume
    or CV.


 6.       Personal Information about Nominee

· What is the nominee’s age?
· What is the nominee’s nationality?
· What languages does the nominee speak?

    Please provide the information below.
· Where was the nominee born? Raised?
· Is the nominee married? Do they have a domestic partner?
· Does the nominee have any children?
· What is the nominee’s level of education? What colleges or universities
did he/she attend?
· Are there any facts about the nominee’s family history that could be
pertinent to the nomination?
· Has the nominee ever been accused or convicted of a crime?

7.  References

    Please include the names, titles, organization affiliations, addresses,
    phone  numbers  and  email  address  of  at  least  three  professional
    references who are well acquainted with the work of the nominee. Please
    also  include  names  and contact information for at least two personal
    references  who are well acquainted with the nominee personally. Please
    make sure that references’ contact information is accurate and current.
    Letters  of  reference  are  not  necessary.  The Goldman Environmental
    Prize does not accept nominations that omit references.


8.  Supporting Material

    If   available,   please   include   documentation   of  the  nominee's
    environmental  activities,  such  as  newspaper  or  magazine  articles
    (please  send  no more than five). Supporting materials are most useful
    to  The  Goldman  Prize  if  they  were recently published, come from a
    reputable  news  source,  and mention the nominee’s name. (These do not
    have  to  be in English, but it is preferred.) Please include a list of
    all  of  the  supporting  materials  that  you  are  submitting. If the
    candidate  becomes  a  finalist  for the Prize, we may then request any
    books  or  videotapes  that  would provide useful information about the
    candidate’s  work. Please do not send books or videos unless we request
    them. However, if such materials are available, please submit a list of
    those that can be sent upon request.


Nominations should be mailed to:      Stephen Mills
                      Sierra Club
                      408 C Street, N.E.
                      Washington, DC 20002
                      USA

The  deadline  for  2008 nominations is Friday, April 20, 2007. Nominations
may be sent via fax (202-547-6009), email ([log in to unmask]) or
express  mail.   Please send the original copies of any material you fax to
us.


                         Guidelines for Nominators

Confidentiality
Confidentiality  is critical to the integrity of our research. Keeping this
in mind, please:
· Do not advise candidates that they have been nominated.
· Be as discreet as possible. Refrain from discussing your nominations with
others. Exceptions can be made should your closest colleagues assist in the
preparation of the nomination.
· Ensure that references respect this confidentiality as well.

Nomination Terms
· Prior to submitting your nomination, please contact Stephen Mills (
[log in to unmask] or 202-675-6691) to determine whether the
individual you intend to nominate is already an active candidate.
· All nominations are active/valid for three years, including the year that
they are submitted. We appreciate updates on your nominees for the 2006 and
2007 Prizes. If you need to know whom you have nominated in the past,
please contact us.
· We accept renominations of candidates by their original nominators if
there is substantial new information that strengthens their candidacy.
Submitting information on a candidate whom you have previously nominated
will not make you/your organization eligible for the honorarium, but it
will reactivate the nominee’s eligibility for the Prize.
· While we do not encourage nomination submissions in languages other than
English, if you feel your English language ability would jeopardize the
strength of your nomination, please contact us.
· We do not accept incomplete nominations.


Collaboration
We   understand  that  many  nominators  may  be  familiar  with  the  same
candidates.  If  you  work  with  other  nominators,  please  do not submit
numerous  nominations  for  the  same  candidate. Also, note that we do not
accept nominations submitted jointly by more than one nominator.

Individuals and their Communities
While  the  Prize  is  given to individuals, we recognize the importance of
communities  and  organizations in many activists’ work and we know that it
can  be  politically  and  culturally problematic to award the Prize to one
person. If this is a concern, please make this clear in your nomination. If
your  candidate is chosen to receive the Prize, we will work to sensitively
address  these issues with the recipient in our media outreach. Please keep
in  mind that each year the Prize is awarded to an individual (occasionally
two), not a community or organization.


        Goldman Environmental Prize Nomination Evaluation Criteria


Formal Criteria

The  following  premises  guide the jury in selecting Goldman Environmental
Prize winners:
· Recent achievements that have enhanced the environment and inspired
others are the foundation for recognition.
· Grassroots initiatives are given priority over scientific, academic or
governmental activities.
· Private citizens are given priority over executives of large NGOs.
· Government employees are eligible only for work outside the scope of
their official responsibilities.
· The Prize is not a lifetime achievement award, nor is it given
posthumously.


Guidelines & Priorities

Goldman  Prize  staff  and  jury  members  also consider the following when
reviewing  candidates.  This  is  not  meant  to  be  a  complete  list  of
guidelines.
· Leadership in a grassroots campaign that seeks to have, or results in, a
significant impact at the regional, national or global level.
· Environmental campaigns that involve significant work with local
communities.
· Individuals who have conducted their work at great personal risk.
· Nominations with very recent, specific environmental accomplishments
(within the last three years).
· Individuals who are members of the community where they do their work.
· Leaders who are well respected by their communities and colleagues.
· Consideration is given to issues or geographic areas not yet recognized
by the global community or the Goldman Environmental Prize.
· Individuals whose current work or campaigns would be significantly
impacted by receiving the Prize.
· An individual’s ability to communicate the scope of their work to the
general public.
· Recipients are often recognized at a certain point in their careers—near
the time of a significant accomplishment and before they become
well-established or well-known.
· While we recognize the importance of communities and organizations in
many activists’ work, we prefer nominations of one individual.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubsribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask] Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp