April
8, 2008
Let Iowans vote on outdoors
funding
The Register's Editorial
Year after year, Iowa lawmakers have failed to adequately fund
recreation and conservation. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources is
left crossing its fingers, wondering whether dollars will be there to
manage parks, lodges, beaches, trails and camp sites. Communities hope
there will be money for green spaces and trails.
Iowans travel to
Missouri or Minnesota for better outdoor vacations. And this state ends up
ranking an embarrassing 48th in the country for funding
recreation.
But things are looking up.
The Iowa Senate
overwhelmingly passed Senate Joint Resolution 2002 to amend the state
constitution to dedicate a portion of state sales and service tax revenue
to the outdoors. The resolution establishes a natural resources and
outdoor recreation trust fund, to be financed with money generated by a
sales-tax rate of three-eighths of 1 percent.
The House should
follow suit. Passing this resolution is only the first step, though. To
amend the state constitution, the resolution must be adopted by two
consecutive Legislatures. Then the amendment needs approval from a
majority of Iowa voters.
Let’s be up front about it: This would be
a tax increase. The state now collects 5 cents in sales tax, and the tax
would go to 5.375 cents.
But this relatively small tax increase for
an individual or family would reap great rewards for the state. It would
raise $150 million annually, the amount necessary to meet Iowa’s outdoors
needs, according to the Legislature’s Interim Committee on Sustainable
Funding for Natural Resources, which endorsed the sales tax.
“The
committee looked at more than 40 alternative strategies,” said Mark
Ackelson, president of the Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation. “This was the
one that was the most secure and gave the public the most opportunity to
weigh in. ”
An investment in recreation is an investment in all of
Iowa. Great parks, trails and public lands attract people, who in turn
attract businesses. Caring about the preservation of Mother Nature can
boost property values and tourism. Studies show Iowans use the outdoors
for biking, hunting, fishing and walking. But it takes money to conserve
land and water and to build and maintain recreational amenities.
It’s rare in Iowa to use the state constitution to specify how funds
will be used. Other examples: Motor-vehicle fees and fuel taxes can be
used only for public highways. State license fees for hunting, fishing and
trapping can be used only for fish and wildlife protection.
Constitutionally targeted funds should remain rare, to leave lawmakers
budget flexibility in changing economic times.
Establishing
dedicated funding for the outdoors is hardly a radical idea, though.
Several neighboring states have done so, through their constitutions or
state law.
Missouri passed and constitutionally protected a portion
of sales tax for the Department of Conservation in 1976. Then in 1984,
voters approved a constitutional amendment for soil and water conservation
and state parks and have reauthorized it twice since then. In 2006, the
measure won approval from 70 percent of voters. Arkansas passed a
constitutional amendment in 1996 to secure dollars for conservation,
parks, tourism, heritage and beautification.
And now it’s Iowa’s
turn. The Senate took the first step toward creating a reliable funding
stream dedicated to the outdoors. There will be a lot more steps and
plenty of time for public discussion. It’s time, though, to see this job
through.