Thanks for the answer. Other than
sheer stupidity, why would the white
house pressure the EPA to not limit perchlorate in tap water? Has there
been any enlightenment from the gov’t on this? What am I saying; it would
seem ‘enlightenment’ and ‘government’ in the same
sentence is an oxymoron. B
From:
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008
8:08 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EPA may not limit
perchlorate in tap water
Based on my
previous knowledge, perchlorate is ubiquitous in groundwater, although the
sources are not always clear. It’s used in dry cleaning, and rocket
fuel (slightly different forms I think!) but there seem to be other sources.
It may be a breakdown product of some other chemical(s). If I
remember correctly, it has also been found on Mars!
Mike Lazere
From:
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008
3:18 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EPA may not limit
perchlorate in tap water
I admit to my ignorance;
why is this stuff in the water and why does the gov’t want to keep it
there? B
From:
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008
12:19 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: EPA may not limit
perchlorate in tap water
From today's American Progress Action report:
ENVIRONMENT -- THE WHITE HOUSE PRESSURES THE
EPA TO NOT LIMIT PERCHLORATE IN TAP WATER: "Under pressure from
the White House and the Pentagon," the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) "is poised to rule as early as today that it will not set a drinking-water safety standard for
perchlorate, a component of rocket fuel that has been linked to thyroid
problems in pregnant women, newborns and young children across the
nation," the Washington Post reports. A near-final version of the
EPA's "preliminary regulatory determination" that the Post
obtained "assumes the maximum allowable perchlorate contamination level is
15 times what the EPA had suggested in 2002." The
proposal is "the final step in a six-year-old battle between career EPA
scientists who advocate regulating the chemical and White House and Pentagon
officials who oppose it." Officials in the White House Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) "heavily edited" the document by
eliminating key passages and asking the EPA to "use a new computer
modeling approach to calculate the chemical's risks." In 2004, the EPA's
process for scientific risk assessments of chemicals was altered to give OMB oversight of the program, which
increased the ability of other departments to interfere in the program
secretly. Last spring, the Government Accountability Office
reported "that the Pentagon had pressured the EPA for several years not to regulate
perchlorate."