For Immediate Release: Monday, March 23,
2009
Contact: Rick Steiner (907) 786-4156; Luke Eshleman (202)
265-7337
$100 MILLION STILL OWED FROM EXXON VALDEZ OIL
SPILL
U.S. and Alaska Fail to Collect $92 Million Damage Claim Filed
Back in 2006
Washington, DC - As the 20th anniversary of the massive
Exxon Valdez oil spill dawns tomorrow, the federal and state governments have
yet to collect all that the oil company agreed to pay. A final $92 million
claim for harm to wildlife, habitat and subsistence users filed in 2006 has
languished ever since.
In 1989, the tanker Exxon Valdez spilled over 11
million gallons of crude oil on the Alaska coast, causing an estimated $15
billion in damages. The 1991 settlement following the guilty plea by Exxon
Corporation (now ExxonMobil) provided for $900 million in payments, a $25
million criminal fine and $100 million in restitution. The plea agreement
also called for added payment of up to $100 million for unanticipated damages
unknown at the time of the settlement. On August 31, 2006, the federal and
state governments jointly submitted a demand for ExxonMobil to pay $92 million,
together with a restoration plan.
After submission of what was called
the "reopener" claim, ExxonMobil had 90 days to pay or respond. Yet the
claim sat unsatisfied, as neither the Bush nor the Palin administrations took
any action to collect.
Today, Professor Rick Steiner, a University of
Alaska professor who has intensively monitored conservation issues relating to
the spill, and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) sent a
letter to both U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Alaska Acting Attorney
General Richard Svobodny asking them to act immediately to collect the overdue
claim.
According to the joint-federal restoration plan presented in 2006,
the funds would be used to address -
"The coastal ecosystem injured by the Exxon Valdez
spill is still a long way from full recovery," said Professor Steiner.
"The governments should bring Exxon into court to collect this last bit of
compensation for their environmental recklessness, and the governments should be
allowed to use the money in the highest and best interest of ecological recovery
- whatever that may be."
For the Obama administration, this may be an
early opportunity to signal its approach to environmental enforcement. In
addition, once secured these funds would be almost immediately translated into
new environmental restoration jobs.
"It is mystifying that our government
has not lifted a finger in the past three years to collect millions that one of
the biggest polluters in history has agreed to pay," stated PEER Executive
Director Jeff Ruch. "At this moment, the $92 million payment would be a
corporate-financed stimulus package, giving taxpayers a welcome break."