TROMSO, Norway, March 20, 2009 (ENS) - Five nations
obliged by treaty to conserve polar bears have resolved to link the future of
the species to urgent global action on climate change.
The polar bear range states -
"We are very encouraged by the
final declaration from this meeting,” says Geoff York, polar bear coordinator
for WWF International’s Arctic Program.
"We were concerned that some
countries were lagging behind the others in their commitment to dealing with
climate change, but ultimately, the parties recognized climate change as the
primary threat to the future well-being of polar bears," said
"Climate change also makes the
polar bear more vulnerable to other threats such as hazardous chemicals,
hunting, disturbances and encroachment upon their natural habitat," he said.
At this week's three day
meeting the polar bear range states also agreed to come up with a circumpolar
action plan for the management of bears, and to formally designate the Polar
Bear Specialist Group of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature,
IUCN, as the scientific advisory body to the Agreement.
These measures were proposed
by WWF in advance of the meeting,
Polar bears rely almost
entirely on the marine sea ice environment for their survival so that large
scale changes in their habitat will impact the population.
Sea ice has declined
considerably over the past half century. Additional declines of roughly 10–50
percent of annual sea ice are predicted by 2100.
The summer sea ice is
projected to decrease by 50–100 percent during the same period. In addition the
quality of the remaining ice will decline. This change may also have a negative
effect on the population size, scientists say.
"Due to their long generation
time and the current greater speed of global warming, it seems unlikely that
polar bear will be able to adapt to the current warming trend in the
Other stress factors that
affect polar bear survival are toxic contaminants, shipping, recreational
viewing, oil and gas exploration and development. In addition, the IUCN says,
there is a potential risk of over-harvest due to increased quotas, excessive
quotas or no quotas in