The First Amendment was expanded, in effect, by the 1885 US
Supreme Court ruling, Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad Company.
The decision grants the legal-political status of “person” to corporations.
This didn’t come out of the blue, as historical developments from the beginning
of the Industrial Revolution paved the way. Talk about “activist judges,” Santa
Clara v So Pacific is a regrettable decision and the effective law of the land.
In everyday language and quite possibly in courts of law, “people”
and “persons” are quite interchangeable. It’s not a very big loophole for
corporate attorneys and judges to fail to parse the words adequately.
Leland
Searles
Air Quality Program Director
Iowa Environmental Council
521 E. Locust St., Suite 220
Des Moines, Iowa 50309
515-244-1194 ext. 204
515-979-6457 (cell)
About
the Iowa Environmental Council:
The Iowa Environmental
Council actively works in public policy to provide a safe, healthy environment
for all Iowans. We focus on public education and coalition building to give
Iowans a voice on issues that affect their quality of life. For more
information contact the Iowa Environmental Council or visit www.iaenvironment.org.
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
Spread environmental awareness.
From: Iowa Discussion,
Alerts and Announcements [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Donna Buell
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: High Court Unleases Tsunami of Corporate Cash w/Citizens
United Ruling
The First Amendment refers to "people".
Corporations are not people. It's nice to know Sierra Club supports
campaign finance reform. We need it for Iowa politics, too.
Donna
On Jan 21, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Neila Seaman wrote:
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 21, 2010
CONTACT: Josh Dorner, 202.675.2384
High Court Unleashes Tsunami of
Corporate Cash with Citizens United Ruling
Washington,
D.C.--The
U.S. Supreme Court today, in its ruling in the case Citizens United v.
Federal Election Commission, struck down significant portions of campaign
finance laws. In particular, the case removed restrictions in place for
decades that have limited campaign spending from corporations. The Sierra
Club offered the following comments in response.
The High
Court's ruling can be viewed here:
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
Statement of Cathy Duvall, Political
Director of Sierra Club
"We
are extremely troubled and dismayed by today's decision. It appears that
the High Court confirmed our worst fears with its sweeping ruling that cast
aside the laws that protected us from unlimited corporate campaign spending.
"Congress
is already awash in a sea of special interest money; this decision will launch
a tsunami of corporate cash whose purpose is to overrun the public's interests.
Big Oil, Dirty Coal, and other special interests have a stranglehold on
the Congress and today's ruling will further endanger the ability of citizens
to influence the political process. This ruling could put today's
"pay-to-play" political culture on steroids.
"We
already have very clear indications of the dangers that lie ahead. The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce, which has been involved in today's case, reported just
yesterday that it spent a record-breaking $71 million on lobbying last quarter.
Even before today's decision, it has already been laundering hundreds of
millions of dollars in corporate cash, most notably for the health insurance
industry and polluters, and has pledged to spend tens of millions of dollars in
this year's elections. Now it and the special interests that fund it will
be allowed to spend limitless amounts not only in the legislative process, but
to support or oppose individual candidates.
"Now
only Congress can stem the tidal wave of special interest cash and influence
peddling that is about to overwhelm the electoral process. The Sierra
Club has long supported campaign finance reform and we now urge Congress to
find a solution to help candidates combat the expected increase in spending on
independent expenditures. In particular, we support passage of the Fair
Elections Now Act."
# # #
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask]
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
<[log in to unmask]>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask] Check out our Listserv Lists
support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To
view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp