| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | |
| Date: | February 19, 2010 |
| Contact: | Bryan Faehner, National Parks Conservation Association,
202-419-3700 Bill Wade, Coalition of National Park Service Retirees, 520.615.9417 John Waterman, Park Ranger Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police, 610.823.2907 Scot McElveen, Association of National Park Rangers, 423.286.8644 |
Statement by Bill Wade, Chair, Executive Council, Coalition of
National Park Service Retirees: “This law is a very bad idea. It is not in the best interests of the visitors
to national parks, the resources to be protected in national parks, nor the
employees in national parks. Opportunistic shooting at wildlife and historic
resources, such as petroglyphs, will increase. Employees, especially law
enforcement rangers, will be more at risk. And visitors will not only be more at
risk, but will now see national parks as places where they need to be more
suspicious and wary of others carrying guns, rather than safe and at peace in
the solitude and sanctuary that parks have always provided. It is a sad chapter
in the history of America’s premier heritage area system.” Statement by John Waterman, President, U.S. Park Rangers Lodge,
Fraternal Order of Police: “The Ranger Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police has opposed this
ill-considered law from the beginning. The new law goes beyond concealed carry
to include all guns anytime. The chances of an inexperienced visitor who
has not seen a bear or buffalo wandering through a campground, gets frightened
and takes out the now readily available firearm and shoots blindly at an animal
or a person in a misguided effort to "protect themselves" from a perceived
threat is now increased. Allowing untrained and unlicensed people carrying
guns in National Parks is an invitation to disaster. It puts the safety of the
public and rangers at increased risk and virtually invites the desecration of
our natural and historic treasures. The previous Reagan era gun rules were
designed to curb poaching and they worked. Commercial and opportunistic poaching
decreased with the prohibition on open armed carry of firearms in National
Parks. What was once a straight forward, easy to understand regulation has now
been changed to a law that encompasses a menagerie of state regulations. The law
now allows individual states to dictate what occurs on Federal Land that belongs
to all Americans and not just the citizens of that particular state. This
law threatens the very nature of a family-friendly National Park. We will
continue to work to change this law.” Statement by Scot McElveen, President, Association of National Park
Rangers: “In this two-year discussion, many have argued that a change in firearms laws
will have either no effect or minimal effect on park wildlife and
resources. We that work and live in national parks across the country know
first-hand the difficulty of gathering enough evidence to successfully prosecute
a poacher. We know, first-hand, all the difficulties of successfully prosecuting
poachers in federal court, and the deterrent effective that successfully
prosecuted poaching cases can have. We think it naïve to believe that purposeful
poachers will not take every advantage of this change in the law and make every
attempt to camouflage themselves to avoid detection. The new law also
makes the decision for opportunistic poachers to act easier. And, the
result of less deterrence means more wildlife are killed and injured, and less
viewable for park visitors to enjoy.” “History tells us that wildlife populations can be decimated by
firearms. The American bison once numbering as many as 200 million and the
passenger pigeon once numbering in the billions are the most striking
examples. It can happen again. ANPR is disappointed in the change in
this law and hopes that one day the American public will trust those that live
and work in parks with the best management judgment for the National Park
System. As stated in the recent Ken Burns’ series about national parks, in
the early years when wildlife populations were disappearing in Yellowstone
National Park, park visitors were prohibited from taking their firearms into the
park and wildlife populations rebounded quickly. The equation is still
that simple today.” Statement by Bryan Faehner, Associate Director for Park Uses,
National Parks Conservation Association: “We remain astonished and disappointed by votes cast by many elected members
of Congress to allow people to openly carry rifles, shotguns, and semi-automatic
weapons in national parks unless otherwise forbidden by the state or local law.
The new law guts balanced and reasonable regulations last updated during the
Reagan Administration that called for visitors to places like Yellowstone, Grand
Canyon, Acadia, and Gettysburg to keep their firearms unloaded and put away.
These common sense regulations have helped keep our national parks safe,
family-friendly destinations for many years.” “The new law places an even greater burden on the already understaffed
National Park Service. Congress must take appropriate action to provide the
agency with sufficient resources to effectively enforce the new law and the
management challenges it creates. As the National Park Service works to educate
the public about the new law, NPCA will closely monitor the steps being taken to
ensure the safety of park visitors, and protection of our American heritage and
wildlife for future generations.” ###