LISTSERV - IOWA-TOPICS Archives - LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG

Approved-By: [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354867b468f915104999bb5ce
Message-ID:  <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:59:11 -0800
Reply-To:     Biotech Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Biotech Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Jim Diamond <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Another partial victory
To:           [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list



--002354867b468f915104999bb5ce
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

In one federal court district, a victory (many years after the problem
surfaced).  Banning GE in wildlife refuges located in other federal court
districts will take more time and effort.

-=-=-=-=-

Fish & Wildlife Drops GM Crops in 12 States
by Dan Flynn
Food Safety News
Jan 11, 2011
http://bit.ly/e4tDKy

In the ongoing, confusing court battles over process involving genetically
engineered (GE) or genetically modified (GM) crops, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service has run up one white flag.

A unit of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife has agreed to
stop planting GE crops on its refuges in a dozen northeastern states.

That ends a federal lawsuit brought against the agency by activist groups
that oppose genetically altered crops. The federal government will continue
to use GM crops on as many as 75 refuges in other areas the country. More
lawsuits are possible.

The settled lawsuit was in the U.S. District Court for Delaware, filed
against the federal government by the Widener Environmental and Natural
Resources Law Clinic on behalf of Delaware Audubon Society, Public Employees
for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Center for Food Safety.

It claimed the Fish & Wildlife Service had illegally entered into
Cooperative Farming Agreements with private parties, allowing hundreds of
acres on its Bombay Hook National Wildlife Refuge in Delaware to be planted
with GM crops without the environmental review required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

In settling the suit, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service promised to revoke
any authorization for further GE agriculture at Bombay Hook and four other
refuges with GE crops--the Rappahannock River Valley Refuge and the Eastern
Shore of Virginia Refuge, Montezuma Refuge in New York and Blackwater Refuge
of Maryland--unless and until an appropriate NEPA analysis is completed, a
condition that has yet to be met for GE agriculture on a National Wildlife
Refuge.

"For Delawareans, this is a victory for the protection of vital public
resources in our state," said Mark Martell, president of the Delaware
Audubon Society.  "Our aim was to end illegal and destructive agriculture on
the Delaware refuges but we are delighted to have this victory extended to
other refuges along the Great Eastern Flyway."

In March 2009, the same groups won a similar lawsuit against GE plantings on
Delaware's Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge.  In August 2009, several
environmental groups led by the Center for Food Safety and PEER wrote to
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to alert him to the implications of the Prime
Hook ruling, asking him to issue a moratorium on all GE crop cultivation in
National Wildlife Refuges.   But Secretary Salazar never responded to the
letter and his agency, which oversees the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, was
unwilling to extend the Bombay Hook settlement beyond the Northeast region.

"Planting genetically engineered crops on wildlife refuges is resource
management malpractice," stated PEER Senior Counsel Paula Dinerstein, noting
that Fish & Wildlife Service policy explicitly forbids "genetically modified
agricultural crops in refuge management unless [they] determine their use is
essential to accomplishing refuge purpose(s)."  "GE crops serve no
legitimate refuge purpose, thus refuge officials must resort to outright
fictions to claim these crops benefit wildlife."

PEER and the Center for Food Safety are pursue litigation in the Southeast,
where many refuges still grow GE crops.  National wildlife refuges have
allowed farming for decades, but in recent years refuge farming has been
converted to GE crops because that is only seed farmers can obtain.  Today,
the majority of crops grown on refuges are genetically engineered.  Some
scientists warn that GE crops can lead to increased pesticide use on
refuges, which they say can harm birds, aquatic animals, and other wildlife.


"GE crops have no place in National Wildlife Refuges," said Paige Tomaselli,
staff attorney with the Center for Food Safety.  "These pesticide-resistant
crops pose significant risks to the very wildlife those refuges serve to
protect, including massively increasing pesticide use and creating of
pesticide-resistant super weeds.  This Northeast region-wide ban is an
important step in the right direction, but the Fish & Wildlife Service must
stop planting these crops in other regions as well."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp








--002354867b468f915104999bb5ce
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In one federal court district, a victory (many years after the problem sur=
faced).=A0 Banning GE in wildlife refuges located in other federal court=
 districts will take more time and effort.=A0 <br><br>-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=A0=
 <br><br>Fish &amp; Wildlife Drops GM Crops in 12 States<br>

by Dan Flynn<br>
Food Safety News<br>
Jan 11, 2011<br>
<a href=3D"http://bit.ly/e4tDKy" target=3D"_blank">http://bit.ly/e4tDKy</a=
><br>
<br>
In the ongoing, confusing court battles over process involving=20
genetically engineered (GE) or genetically modified (GM) crops, the U.S.
 Fish &amp; Wildlife Service has run up one white flag.<br>
<br>
A unit of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish &amp; Wildlife has=20
agreed to stop planting GE crops on its refuges in a dozen northeastern=20
states.<br>
<br>
That ends a federal lawsuit brought against the agency by activist=20
groups that oppose genetically altered crops. The federal government=20
will continue to use GM crops on as many as 75 refuges in other areas=20
the country. More lawsuits are possible.<br>
<br>
The settled lawsuit was in the U.S. District Court for Delaware, filed=20
against the federal government by the Widener Environmental and Natural=20
Resources Law Clinic on behalf of Delaware Audubon Society, Public=20
Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Center for=20
Food Safety.<br>
<br>
It claimed the Fish &amp; Wildlife Service had illegally entered into=20
Cooperative Farming Agreements with private parties, allowing hundreds=20
of acres on its Bombay Hook National Wildlife Refuge in Delaware to be=20
planted with GM crops without the environmental review required by the=20
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).<br>
<br>
In settling the suit, the U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service promised to=20
revoke any authorization for further GE agriculture at Bombay Hook and=20
four other refuges with GE crops--the Rappahannock River Valley Refuge=20
and the Eastern Shore of Virginia Refuge, Montezuma Refuge in New York=20
and Blackwater Refuge of Maryland--unless and until an appropriate NEPA=20
analysis is completed, a condition that has yet to be met for GE=20
agriculture on a National Wildlife Refuge.<br>
<br>
&quot;For Delawareans, this is a victory for the protection of vital publi=
c=20
resources in our state,&quot; said Mark Martell, president of the Delaware=
=20
Audubon Society. =A0&quot;Our aim was to end illegal and destructive=20
agriculture on the Delaware refuges but we are delighted to have this=20
victory extended to other refuges along the Great Eastern Flyway.&quot;<br=
>
<br>
In March 2009, the same groups won a similar lawsuit against GE=20
plantings on Delaware&#39;s Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge. =A0In Aug=
ust=20
2009, several environmental groups led by the Center for Food Safety and
 PEER wrote to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to alert him to the=20
implications of the Prime Hook ruling, asking him to issue a moratorium=20
on all GE crop cultivation in National Wildlife Refuges. =A0 But Secretary
 Salazar never responded to the letter and his agency, which oversees=20
the U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service, was unwilling to extend the Bombay
 Hook settlement beyond the Northeast region.<br>
<br>
&quot;Planting genetically engineered crops on wildlife refuges is resourc=
e=20
management malpractice,&quot; stated PEER Senior Counsel Paula Dinerstein,=
=20
noting that Fish &amp; Wildlife Service policy explicitly forbids=20
&quot;genetically modified agricultural crops in refuge management unless=
=20
[they] determine their use is essential to accomplishing refuge=20
purpose(s).&quot; =A0&quot;GE crops serve no legitimate refuge purpose, th=
us refuge=20
officials must resort to outright fictions to claim these crops benefit=20
wildlife.&quot;<br>
<br>
PEER and the Center for Food Safety are pursue litigation in the=20
Southeast, where many refuges still grow GE crops. =A0National wildlife=20
refuges have allowed farming for decades, but in recent years refuge=20
farming has been converted to GE crops because that is only seed farmers
 can obtain. =A0Today, the majority of crops grown on refuges are=20
genetically engineered. =A0Some scientists warn that GE crops can lead to=
=20
increased pesticide use on refuges, which they say can harm birds,=20
aquatic animals, and other wildlife. =A0<br>
<br>
&quot;GE crops have no place in National Wildlife Refuges,&quot; said Paig=
e=20
Tomaselli, staff attorney with the Center for Food Safety. =A0&quot;These=
=20
pesticide-resistant crops pose significant risks to the very wildlife=20
those refuges serve to protect, including massively increasing pesticide
 use and creating of pesticide-resistant super weeds. =A0This Northeast=20
region-wide ban is an important step in the right direction, but the=20
Fish &amp; Wildlife Service must stop planting these crops in other=20
regions as well.&quot;<br>
<br>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-BIOTECH-FORUM list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

--002354867b468f915104999bb5ce--