Here's Dr. Jim Diamond's reply to a recent comment about genetically  
engineered trees. Dr. Diamond is currently acting chair of the Sierra Club  
Genetic Engineering Action Team (GEAT).--Tom
 =======================================================================
[OK to post this]

Tom,

I certainly agree with the statement  that tree plantations on private 
lands are already a big problem.  The  extension of these plantations by means 
of varieties genetically engineered for  faster growth, low seed production, 
low lignin and so forth will make things  worse in a few foreseeable ways, 
and perhaps in other ways which we can't yet  foresee.  For one, if they're 
used for biofuels they'll be taking over more  acreage (more hundreds of 
square miles) including so-called "marginal  lands."  If they ever make good 
economic sense, they'll also take over from  real forests.  For two, they'll be 
exported around the world and market  economics dictates that food acreage 
in poor countries will be diverted to  biofuels production to feed the 
internal combustion engines of rich folks.   (Yes, this too is already happening 
with biodiesel from palm plantations.) This  is not only immoral but will 
raise food prices worldwide.  Third,  genetically engineered traits will 
spread by seed and pollen and will bring  unwanted changes to national parks and 
other protected areas to a far greater  extent. Fast growing trees, for 
instance, may turn into bioinvasive weeds.   Fourth, the traits can be a danger. 
 A low lignin tree, for instance, has  less structural strength but may not 
appear to be different from a  non-engineered tree.  It will be more likely 
to blow over onto a car or a  home.  Fifth, faster growing means it sucks 
up resources faster, whether  water or important trace minerals.  At 
industrial scale this means  depletion of the soil is accelerated and consequently 
more industrial  fertilizers will be applied with all their problems. 

The biofuels  industry will always say that their goal is more production 
on fewer acres, but  the facts are that if any new product makes more profit 
per acre, the acres will  increase.  I think there are many reasons to be 
concerned.  Using  trees for energy is something humans have been doing for 
perhaps a million  years, but it's caused problems and we already know how to 
do better.  We  can get far more energy per acre from PV and wind, for 
instance.  That's  where research and incentive dollars should be going.  We also 
need to  preserve true forests and other wilderness.

Well, I think we agree.   Sorry I've sounded too argumentative in 
presenting these  arguments.

Jim



On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, <[log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) > wrote:


Jim,
 
I appreciated your statement on genetically engineered  pines and posted it 
to the Club Iowa Topics list. Do you want to reply to  this comment? I will 
post your reply to Iowa Topics, if you so  wish.--Tom
 
 ===========================================================================
==
Pine trees have already been a plantation crop in many states especially  
in the southeast where lumber companies own vast amounts tracts of pine  
forests. Most of America's lumber comes from private land where there are no  
regulations. 
----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Mathews <[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) >
To: [log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 
Sent: Mon, 17 Jan 2011  22:48:29 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Fwd: USDA grant for GE trees


This  is from the national Sierra Club Biotech Forum.

In a message dated  1/17/2011 7:37:33 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask])  writes:



There is a  pine tree in Sierra Club's logo, so the following  news item is
very  troubling to me:
The University of California, Davis,  has been  awarded a $14.8 million 
grant
through NIFA, the National Institute  of  Food and Agriculture program (this
is part of the US Dept. of Ag) to  map  the DNA sequence of pines.  "Using
fast-growing trees such  as loblolly  pine for fuels also can contribute to
carbon  sequestration and may help  mitigate the effects of climate  
change,"
USDA said.  According to  Roger Beachy, the project,  "will generate and use
genomics information to  provide an  understanding of genes and genetics in
conifers to help in  developing  new bioenergy sources."  (Roger Beachy is
currently  president of  the NIFA, developed the first GE tomato and served 
 
as
president  of the Danford Plant Science Center in Saint Louis, which   
received
a founding gift of 40 acres and $50 million from  Monsanto.)   
This means that pine trees may become a plantation  crop.  Tree  plantations
will, wherever planted, replace  biodiversity and replace real  forests.  
This
will be done  with pretence that biofuel is carbon  neutral.  I don't want  
to
take time to argue that point at the moment  - probably most of us  realize
that true forests sequester far more  carbon.  Right now  I just want to say
that destruction of forests and  the great  biodiversity they represent will
greatly impoverish all of us who   love and connect to the natural world.
Nature of course will still  exist,  but in a diminished form.  And the 
armies
of  genetically altered pines  which may occupy the place of old forests  
will
spread via seeds and pollen,  not respecting the boundaries of  national
forests and parks. 
posted by  Jim Diamond,  M.D.



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - -  - - - - - -
To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions,   see:
_http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp_ 
(http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp) 




-  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To  unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 

Check  out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
_http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp_ 
(http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp) 

Sign up to  receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a  month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and  view recent
editions at _http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/_ 
(http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/) 

- - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the  IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 

Check  out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
_http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp_ 
(http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp) 






- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship
e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's
latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent
editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/