ANCHORAGE, Alaska - U.S. Sen. Mark Begich on Monday compared the regulatory
atmosphere for offshore drilling in the Arctic Ocean to a whack-a-mole arcade
game, where the player uses a mallet to smack down moles as they pop out of the
ground.
In the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, under the Alaska Democrat's
scenario, oil companies are the players and federal agencies are the
moles.
"Each time we have one mole beat down, another one pops up and
derails the process," Begich said.
Standing with representatives of
Alaska oil companies who want to drill, including Shell Oil and ConocoPhillips,
Begich said the answer is a federal coordinator for Arctic outer continental
shelf drilling who could smooth applications through the
bureaucracy.
"For too long, well before the current administration,
federal agencies have erected roadblocks to that development," Begich
said.
He has introduced a bill to create an offshore drilling
coordinator's office , and said the $2 million price tag is would be than worth
it if Alaska's vast resources are tapped.
"This office would have the
authority to work across agencies causing Alaska so much heartburn today - the
EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Interior Department," Begich
said.
The measure would also have an effect on permit appeals. Short of
the U.S. Supreme Court, the bill would require expedited rulings to challenges
of permits and move jurisdiction to the federal district court in Washington,
D.C.
Shell Alaska Vice President Pete Slaiby endorsed the
measure.
"The legislation that the senator is proposing today could go a
long way to address some of the regulatory challenges facing responsible
offshore development in Alaska," Slaiby said.
America needs energy from
Alaska waters and Alaskans need the jobs from offshore petroleum development,
Begich said. Federal regulators estimate Arctic waters hold 26 million barrels
of recoverable oil and 130 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
"For too
long, well before the current administration, federal agencies have erected
roadblocks to that development," Begich said.
What Begich called
roadblocks, others have called precautions.
Environmental and Alaska
Native groups contend the oil industry has not demonstrated the ability to clean
up an oil spill in ice-choked waters.
Drilling critics say too little is
known about the species that live there, which already are being affected by
global warming and less summer sea ice, or how seismic tests and other drilling
activity will affect them.
Even in the window of ice-free months,
conditions can be brutal off Alaska's northeast and northern shore. The nearest
Coast Guard base is more than 1,000 miles away from lease areas and the northern
Alaska coast lacks deep-water ports and major runways near most drilling
sites.
In the aftermath of the Gulf of Mexico spill, Interior Secretary
Ken Salazar said the d epartment would use "utmost caution" in future drilling
lease sales in Arctic Ocean waters.
Begich said the current system is not
working. Shell has spent more than $3 billion for the opportunity to drill, he
said.
"Just when it appeared the development had a green light a few
weeks ago, an internal EPA environmental appeals board sent the air quality back
to the drawing board," he said.
Begich said the offshore oil and gas
industry grew up in the Gulf of Mexico.
"The process there with the same
oil companies and the same agencies works much better," he said.
His
legislation, he said, would allow permit appeals.
"It does recognize
America needs this energy and the issues surrounding it should be resolved
quickly," he said.