Maybe it's not all Vilsack's fault.--Tom
In a message dated 7/8/2011 6:20:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
1.What Happens to Antitrust Inquiry?
2.Why Christine Varney Left
the Justice Department:
Suckerpunched on Anti-Trust
EXTRACTS: Last
year, Varney [Obama's Anti-Trust chief] and Secretary of Agriculture Tom
Vilsack hosted a series of workshops around the country to discuss competition
and regulatory issues faced by the agriculture industry... Nothing has
yet come of those hearings.
"I was told by people they were definitely
going after Monsanto. And nothing has happened. She wanted to go after
Monsanto and she was stopped. That's my feeling. It's been two years. They
have had plenty of time to haul them into court."
"The people they
promised to go after and hang high are being shaken down to provide the
billion dollar Obama campaign fund. Varney was shut down by Obama's political
machine."
"They raised our hopes and nothing happened. I feel sucker
punched."
---
---
1.What Happens to Antitrust Inquiry?
Daily
Yonder, 7 July
2011
http://www.dailyyonder.com/thursday-roundup-what-happens-antitrust-inquiry/2011/07/07/3417
The
Obama administration's top antitrust officer, Christine Varney, is stepping
down after two and a half years. She will join a large Washington, D.C., law
firm, Cravath, Swaine & Moore.
What does that have to do with
rural America? Plenty.
Last year, Varney and Secretary of Agriculture
Tom Vilsack hosted a series of workshops around the country to talk about
anti-trust problems in the food business. Thousands turned out for discussions
that looked at concentration in the seed business, among meat processors, in
the chicken industry and among food retailers. Nothing has yet come of those
hearings.
"She played a high profile role in the highly publicized
inter-departmental agriculture workshops, but so far very little has emerged
from the effort," said Albert Foer at the American Antitrust
Institute.
Fred Stokes of the Organization for Competitive Markets said
Vilsack and Varney were "totally sincere" in their intention, but that the
effort was stymied by the demands of the election season. "The people they
promised to go after and hang high are being shaken down to provide the
billion dollar Obama campaign fund," Stokes told Counterpunch. "Varney was
shut down by Obama's political machine."
"Varney was totally sincere
when she came into office," Stokes said. "But she had the rug pulled out from
under her."
"It is most likely that Christine Varney is leaving in
total frustration with being hampered from doing from what she sincerely
intended to do – curbing the market abuses that are putting independent family
farmers and ranchers out of business and savaging rural America," Stokes said.
"I'm from Mississippi," Stokes said. "I endured ridicule and scorn for
my unabashedly pro Obama administration stance and politics down here. These
were going to be finally the folks who were going to turn things around and we
were going to reverse the destruction of rural America. It hasn't
happened."
"I was told by people they were definitely going after
Monsanto," Stokes said. "And nothing has happened. She wanted to go after
Monsanto and she was stopped. That's my feeling. It's been two years. They
have had plenty of time to haul them into court."
"They raised our
hopes and nothing happened," Stokes said. "I feel sucker
punched."
---
---
2.Why Christine Varney Left the Justice
Department
Suckerpunched on Anti-Trust
RUSSELL MOKHIBER
Counterpunch,
July 7 2011
http://counterpunch.org/mokhiber07072011.html
Christine
Varney is leaving the Antitrust Division.
And going to Cravath Swaine
& Moore in New York.
"There is no doubt that her tireless work
helped protect consumers and businesses from anti-competitive conduct and
preserved competition in America's economy," Attorney General Eric Holder said
yesterday.
But others were less favorable about Varney's tenure at the
Antitrust Division.
Albert Foer at the American Antitrust Institute
gave Varney an "I" for incomplete.
"Christine Varney began the process
of turning around a tanker ship that was going down," Foer told me. "She
pointed it in a better direction but with judicial winds blowing strong the
wrong way, her captaincy failed to accomplish all we had hoped for
it."
"The rhetoric and appointments were generally strong, but an
evaluation will have to wait until we know whether her conduct-oriented,
rather than structure-oriented, remedies in major merger cases will preserve
competition and we will also have to see what cases are in the works and have
not yet been revealed," Foer said. "The Bush Administration probably would
have let these mergers go through without conditions. But the problem is we
aren't sure her conditions will make a difference."
"She gets credit
for revoking the Bush Administration's weak document on monopoly, but has done
little to re-establish anti-monopoly enforcement. She brought several cases
that have potential to be important, but we don't know how they will turn out.
She oversaw a clarification and mild modernization of the horizontal merger
guidelines, but it is too soon to know whether they will have a significant
impact."
"She brought cartel cases, but so did predecessors. She played
a high profile role in the highly publicized inter-departmental agriculture
workshops, but so far very little has emerged from the effort. She apparently
played no role during the banking crisis. Her efforts in the international
arena were generally positive, though there was a tense period with the EU
over a merger and a tense period with the FTC that took two to tango but which
did not help the public image of the overall antitrust effort. All in all, the
report card says 'incomplete.'"
Fred Stokes of the Organization for
Competitive Markets was less forgiving than Foer.
Last year, Varney and
Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack hosted a series of workshops around the
country to discuss competition and regulatory issues faced by the agriculture
industry.
More than 4,000 attendees attended workshops in Ankeny, Iowa,
Normal, Alabama, Madison, Wisconsin, Fort Collins, Colorado and Washington,
D.C.
Stokes believes that Varney and Vilsack were "totally sincere"
when they promised action against the big agribusiness
corporations.
And he says he believes the reason they were unable to
take action – to fulfill their promises – was because they were shut down by
the Obama political machine.
"The people they promised to go after and
hang high are being shaken down to provide the billion dollar Obama campaign
fund," Stokes said. "Varney was shut down by Obama's political
machine."
"Varney was totally sincere when she came into office,"
Stokes said. "But she had the rug pulled out from under her."
"It is
most likely that Christine Varney is leaving in total frustration with being
hampered from doing from what she sincerely intended to do – curbing the
market abuses that are putting independent family farmers and ranchers out of
business and savaging rural America," Stokes said.
"When she came into
office, she was on fire," Stokes said. "She made pronouncements against Dean
Foods, against Monsanto, against the big meat packers. But she did nothing
about it."
"At the poultry workshop in Alabama last year in June 2010,
they had probably 50 contract poultry producers who lined up. They told about
all the things that were being done to them. And many of them said at the end
that it is likely that their contracts will be terminated."
"Christine
Varney stood up and said – here is my card with my direct number, if they do
anything like that, you call me. She raised so many eyebrows. At workshop
after workshop, she stood up for the farmers."
"But in response, they
have done nothing, absolutely nothing. They had five workshops across the
country. She stood up and made fiery speeches at every one of them. And yet
nothing has happened."
How does Stokes know that she wanted to do the
right thing but was shut down by the political apparatus?
"I am 77
years old," Stokes said. "I have acquired ability to judge people pretty good.
She and Secretary Vilsack were absolutely sincere. Some of the big targets
that they were after are now being shaken down for a billion dollar campaign
fund."
"I'm from Mississippi," Stokes said. "I endured ridicule and
scorn for my unabashedly pro Obama administration stance and politics down
here. These were going to be finally the folks who were going to turn things
around and we were going to reverse the destruction of rural America. It
hasn't happened."
"I was told by people they were definitely going
after Monsanto," Stokes said. "And nothing has happened. She wanted to go
after Monsanto and she was stopped. That's my feeling. It's been two years.
They have had plenty of time to haul them into court."
"They raised our
hopes and nothing happened," Stokes said. "I feel sucker
punched."
Russell Mokhiber edits the Corporate Crime
Reporter.
................................................................
Website:
http://www.gmwatch.org
Profiles:
http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/GM_Watch:_Portal
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/GMWatch
Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/GMWatch/276951472985?ref=nf
This email
should only be sent to those who have asked to receive it.
To unsubscribe,
contact [log in to unmask], specifying which list you wish to unsubscribe
from.