Excerpt:
If the presence of surviving waterhemp and  horseweed/marestail is more 
widespread, a trip back in time using a  cultivator is really the only option 
to reduce the problems with these  escapes.
 
In a message dated 7/24/2011 10:00:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:






This is just out from Iowa State University weed scientists.   Apparently 
the best option they can come up with for controlling  glyphosate-resistant 
weeds is cultivation.



Ah -- the same conclusion some of us  came to a LONG time ago...








Managing  Glyphosate Failures



By Bob  Hartzler and Mike Owen, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State  
University



In the  past week we have received numerous calls from farmers, agchem 
dealers and  industry representatives regarding waterhemp and 
horseweed/marestail  surviving glyphosate applications made in late June and early July.  
Although there are numerous reasons why a herbicide application might fail  at 
controlling weeds, we are certain that a significant percentage of  these 
failures are due to the presence of glyphosate-resistant biotypes in  the field.



The  common question is what can be done to rescue the situation in the 
field.  Unfortunately, at this time of the year there are few  options.

If  glyphosate failed earlier to control the weeds, it is unlikely that a  
repeat application will do any good in controlling the surviving weeds.  The 
PPO inhibitors (Reflex, Cobra, Phoenix, UltraBlazer, etc.) are the  other 
postemergence option available for waterhemp in  soybean.

However,  the label restrictions regarding weed size are long past and thus 
these  herbicides are unlikely to provide affective control. There also is 
a  potential for serious crop injury with the high temperature forecast for  
the coming week.  Furthermore, the harvest interval restrictions for  each 
of these products should be reviewed.



Although  not popular with the majority of growers, mechanical control is 
really the  only available option to manage escaped and/or 
herbicide-resistant  waterhemp and horseweed/marestail at this time. If only scattered plants  
are present in the field, hand-weeding the field would be worth the effort  
since this will slow the establishment and spread of resistance within the  
field. If the presence of surviving waterhemp and horseweed/marestail is  
more widespread, a trip back in time using a cultivator is really the only  
option to reduce the problems with these escapes.



Bob  Hartzler and Micheal Owen are professors of agronomy and weed science  
extension specialists with responsibilities in weed management and  
herbicide use.







 
____________________________________


From:  Biotech Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
On  Behalf Of Laurel Hopwood
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 9:40  AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject: Resistant  weeds leave farmers desperate



http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/article_f01139be-ace0-502b-944a-0c534
b70511c.html#ixzz1SNadASFT
Resistant  weeds leave farmers desperate
St Louis Today, July 17 2011
by  Georgina Gustin
EDITED

Weeds are becoming increasingly resistant  to Monsanto's Roundup forcing 
farmers to use other herbicides or multiple  modes of action. But farmers are 
finding that these other modes of action  aren't working either - and there 
appears to be little relief on the  horizon. Farmers are also frustrated  
because these additional  herbicides are costing them profits.

Critics of the industry point  out that Monsanto and its competitors have 
known about glyphosate  resistance.
Brett Lorenzen, a legal analyst with the Environmental  Working Group, 
stated "It's hard to read a 54-page  booklet." 

Laurel writes:
Monsanto apparently had an  aggressive PR campaign to convince farmers that 
GM crops would make it  easier and cheaper to farm.  It's unfortunate that 
farmers are now  seeing the truth and are apparently having a difficult time 
purchasing non  GM crops.
The quote about the 54 page booklet being "hard to read" is  very telling.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - To 
unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-BIOTECH-FORUM  list, send any message to:  
[log in to unmask] Check out our  Listserv 
Lists support site for more information:  
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms  & Conditions, see: 
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from  the CONS-SPST-BIOTECH-FORUM list, send 
any message to:  
[log in to unmask] Check out our  Listserv Lists support site for more information:  
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms  & 
Conditions, see:  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp



 
____________________________________
Iowa Native Plants mailing list
[log in to unmask]  _ (mailto:[log in to unmask]) 
_http://atmos.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm  _ 
(http://atmos.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm)  
The Iowa Native Plants Mailing List provides a forum for those interested  
in Iowa's natural
vegetation and in general conservation issues. Another  objective is to 
promote the Iowa
Native Plant Society. This list is owned  and managed by Diana Horton, and 
sponsored by
the University of Iowa  Department of Biology.

For assistance, contact Diana Horton, [log in to unmask] _ 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp