I didn’t see the second piece. This is all very interesting and newsworthy. I wonder what internal politics are at work. The reversal looks imminently exploitable.

 

Leland Searles

Air Quality Program Director

Iowa Environmental Council

521 E. Locust St., Suite 220

Des Moines, Iowa 50309

515-244-1194 ext. 204

www.iaenvironment.org

www.facebook.com/Iowa.Environmental.Council

 

About the Iowa Environmental Council:

The Iowa Environmental Council actively works in public policy to provide a safe, healthy environment for all Iowans. We focus on public education and coalition building to give Iowans a voice on issues that affect their quality of life.  For more information contact the Iowa Environmental Council or visit www.iaenvironment.org

 

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. Spread environmental awareness.

 

From: Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jane Clark
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Iowa Farm Bureau votes against conservation again

 

Lee—this article says they reversed their vote from what had been reported in the DMR today.  However, I have not read the entire blog.

 

Emphasis mine.

Jane Clark

 

Farm Bureau reverses on conservation

10:52 AM, Aug 31, 2011 | by Dan Piller

The Iowa Farm Bureau’s policy conference reversed itself Wednesday morning. After lengthy debate and a multitude of motions, the group approved a resolution stating that compliance with conservation programs not be a condition for purchasing federally subsidized insurance programs.

The new resolution reads “the Iowa Farm Bureau supports conservation compliance; however, eligibility for federal crop insurance should not be subject to farm program conservation requirements

 

 

From: Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Searles, Leland
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Iowa Farm Bureau votes against conservation again

 

Huh? Unless you’re very cynical about how this is contingent on the end to direct payments, it appears to be a vote for conservation. Please explain how it is a vote against.

 

 

From: Iowa Discussion, Alerts and Announcements [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cindy Hildebrand
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Iowa Farm Bureau votes against conservation again

 

http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/08/31/farm-bureau-reverses-on-conservation/

 

 

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask] Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to: [log in to unmask] Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp