So despite much more powerful public opinion in opposition to GMOs, in
Europe the industry largely regulates itself, just like here in the US.
Does EFSA have the means of its remit?” [Translation from British English:
Does EFSA have the ability to carry out its mission?]
Tom
In a message dated 6/17/2013 4:01:23 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
European
Food Safety Authority mishandled a major revolving doors case with
biotechnology company Syngenta
Press release by Corporate Europe
Observatory and Testbiotech
29 May
2013
http://corporateeurope.org/pressreleases/2013/eu-ombudsman-efsa-fails-conflict-interests-p
In
a May 23 ruling, the EU Ombudsman stated that EFSA (European Food Safety
Authority) failed to take adequate measures to prevent conflict of interests
arising from a major 'revolving doors' case in 2008. According to the
Ombudsman's conclusions, EFSA “failed to fulfil the procedural obligations
emanating from the applicable rules” and did not “acknowledge its failure to
observe the relevant procedural rules and to carry out a sufficiently thorough
assessment of the potential conflict of interests (…).” Furthermore “EFSA
unduly restricted the scope of what might amount to a possible conflict of
interest (...).”These statements relate to the case of Dr Suzy Renckens, who
was head of EFSA´s unit responsible for the risk assessment of genetically
engineered plants from 2003 till 2008 before moving directly to a top EU
lobbying position at Syngenta, a company that produces and markets these very
plants.
Martin Pigeon, researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe
Observatory, said: “this highly symbolic case reminds everybody how strategic
EFSA is for the agrofood industry, and how weak EFSA's independence policy
remains. The agency's management of this case shows that it failed to take the
crucial issue of corporate influence seriously, an inexcusable failure for a
body supposedly 'commited to ensuring that Europe's food is safe'. Does EFSA
have the means of its remit?”
Testbiotech brought the Renckens case to
public attention in 2009 but EFSA and the EU Commission refused to take any
action. Therefore, Testbiotech, with the support of Corporate Europe
Observatory (CEO), asked the EU Ombudsman to investigate the case. The EU
Ombudsman sent a series of first recommendations in 2011, stating that EFSA
did not handle this case correctly. EFSA then changed its rules and procedures
in December 2011 to strengthen its independence, but, according to the
Ombudsman ruling published last May 23 (see bottom), the Ombudsman clearly
sees need for further improvements. With his judgement, the Ombudsman fuels
concerns about EFSA´s independence policy which were already expressed in a
report from the European Court of Auditors published in October 2012, as well
as two resolutions from the European Parliament in 2012 and 2013 in the
framework of the budget discharge process.
“EFSA seems to not be able
to solve its problems with conflict of interests. For example, the authority
still lacks sufficient standards in its relationship with the industry think
tank International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). After criticism from many
sides, experts working with ILSI are now mostly excluded from being involved
in the work of EFSA; but experts who worked with ILSI for many years and then
officially ended their cooperation still are decisive for EFSA´s scientific
work.” says Christoph Then for Testbiotech. “All the key decisions and risk
assessment protocols that were influenced by ILSI´s experts in the last ten
years were never re-evaluated.”
For instance, Juliane Kleiner just
became EFSA's Director of Science Strategy and Coordination. Kleiner joined
EFSA right after a career at ILSI between 1997 and 2004. Gijs Kleter, who
officially worked with ILSI from 2002-2007 on risk assessment of genetically
engineered plants, is now the vice-chair of EFSA´s expert group on genetically
engineered organisms (“GMO Panel”). Harry Kuiper was the chair of EFSA´s GMO
Panel from 2003 to 2012 and in parallel a member of ILSI working groups for
several years, but the standards and decisions he was responsible for were
never re-assessed by EFSA. His case was also brought up by Testbiotech in a
complaint to the EU Ombudsman that is still
pending.
Contacts:
Martin Pigeon, Corporate Europe Observatory
(CEO), phone: +32 2 893 09 30 / +32 484 671 909
[log in to unmask]
Dr. Christoph Then, Testbiotech, Tel.: + 49 (0)
15154638040, [log in to unmask]
The recent judgement of the EU Ombudsman:
www.testbiotech.de/node/801
The full chronology of the complaint about
EFSA: www.testbiotech.org/independence
A Testbiotech briefing about Harry
Kuiper and ILSI: http://www.testbiotech.de/en/node/429
A report from
Corporate Europe Observatory about ILSI:
http://corporateeurope.org/blog/new-briefing-international-life-sciences-institute-ilsi-corporate-lobbygroup
==============================================
You
received this email because you signed up for a GMWatch Review or Daily
List
Unsubscribe [log in to unmask] from this
list:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=151eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e&c=a2ee7c33f7
Forward
this email to a
friend:
http://us6.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=a2ee7c33f7&e=ec3824c80e
Update
your
profile:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=151eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e