In a message dated 7/7/2013 4:29:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

 
So why the EPA would increase the allowed residue of glyphosate in our  
food supply is a mystery. Unless the EPA is more concerned with helping  
companies like Monsanto than they are with protecting the environment an human  
health.
 
By the way, the Roundup Ready crops now commercialized are corn (maize),  
soybeans, cotton, canola, alfalfa, and sugar beets. Contrary to a recently  
posted article, wheat and sugar cane are not Roundup Ready, at least not in  
commercialized form.
 
--Tom
 
In a message dated 7/3/2013 12:58:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

NOTE:  Below is yet another study throwing into question the reliability of 
 regulatory classifications of glyphosate and Roundup.

The levels of  Roundup and glyphosate found in this study to be toxic to 
Daphnia magna, the  water flea, are minuscule and are well within levels 
expected to be found in  the environment.

But glyphosate is classed by regulators as  “practically nontoxic” to 
aquatic invertebrates.

Daphnia magna is a  widely accepted model for environmental toxicity.

This study follows  an earlier study by some of the same authors which 
showed that Bt maize fed  to daphnia magna reduced their  fitness:
http://www.gmwatch.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14943
---
---
Clone-  and age-dependent toxicity of a glyphosate commercial formulation 
and its  active ingredient in Daphnia magna
Marek Cuhra, Terje Traavik, and Thomas  Bøhn
Ecotoxicology. 2013 March; 22(2): 251–262
Open  access:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572389/

Abstract
Low  levels of glyphosate based herbicide induced significant negative 
effects on  the aquatic invertebrate Daphnia magna. Glyphosate herbicides such 
as brands  of Roundup, are known to be toxic to daphnids. However, published 
findings  on acute toxicity show significant discrepancies and variation 
across  several orders of magnitude. To test the acute effects of both 
glyphosate  and a commercial formulation of Roundup (hereafter Roundup), we 
conducted a  series of exposure experiments with different clones and age-classes of 
D.  magna. The results demonstrated EC50 (48) values in the low ppm-range 
for  Roundup as well as for the active ingredient (a.i.) isopropylamine salt 
of  glyphosate (glyphosate IPA) alone. Roundup showed slightly lower acute  
toxicity than glyphosate IPA alone, i.e. EC50 values of 3.7–10.6 mg a.i./l,  
as compared to 1.4–7.2 mg a.i./l for glyphosate IPA. However, in chronic  
toxicity tests spanning the whole life-cycle, Roundup was more toxic. D.  
magna was exposed to sublethal nominal concentrations of 0.05, 0.15, 0.45,  
1.35 and 4.05 mg a.i./l for 55 days. Significant reduction of juvenile size  
was observed even in the lowest test concentrations of 0.05 mg a.i./l, for  
both glyphosate and Roundup. At 0.45 mg a.i./l, growth, fecundity and  
abortion rate was affected, but only in animals exposed to Roundup. At 1.35  and 
4.05 mg a.i./l of both glyphosate and Roundup, significant negative  effects 
were seen on most tested parameters, including mortality. D. magna  was 
adversely affected by a near 100% abortion rate of eggs and embryonic  stages at 
1.35 mg a.i./l of Roundup. The results indicate that aquatic  invertebrate 
ecology can be adversely affected by relevant ambient  concentrations of this 
major herbicide. We conclude that glyphosate and  Roundup toxicity to 
aquatic invertebrates have been underestimated and that  current European 
Commission and US EPA toxicity classification of these  chemicals need to be  
revised.
==============================================
You received  this email because you signed up for a GMWatch Review or 
Daily  List

Unsubscribe [log in to unmask] from this  list:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&
id=151eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e&c=917f786489

Forward  this email to a  friend:
http://us6.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=917
f786489&e=ec3824c80e

Update  your  profile:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=15
1eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e


 
 
____________________________________
Iowa Native Plants mailing list
[log in to unmask]  _ (mailto:[log in to unmask]) 
_http://atmos.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm  _ 
(http://atmos.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm)  
The Iowa Native Plants Mailing List provides a forum for those interested  
in Iowa's natural
vegetation and in general conservation issues. Another  objective is to 
promote the Iowa
Native Plant Society. This list is owned  and managed by Diana Horton, and 
sponsored by
the University of Iowa  Department of Biology.

For assistance, contact Diana Horton, [log in to unmask]  _ 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 


-----Original Message-----
Subject:  
=?utf-8?Q?GMW=3A=20Roundup=20and=20glyphosate=20toxicity=20underestimated=20=2D=20study?=
From:  =?utf-8?Q?GMWatch?= <[log in to unmask]>
To: =?utf-8?Q??=  <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:58:57  +0000


NOTE: Below is yet another study throwing into question the  reliability of 
regulatory classifications of glyphosate and  Roundup.

The levels of Roundup and glyphosate found in this study to be  toxic to 
Daphnia magna, the water flea, are minuscule and are well within  levels 
expected to be found in the environment.

But glyphosate is  classed by regulators as “practically nontoxic” to 
aquatic  invertebrates.

Daphnia magna is a widely accepted model for  environmental toxicity.

This study follows an earlier study by some of  the same authors which 
showed that Bt maize fed to daphnia magna reduced their  fitness:
http://www.gmwatch.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14943
---
---
Clone-  and age-dependent toxicity of a glyphosate commercial formulation 
and its  active ingredient in Daphnia magna
Marek Cuhra, Terje Traavik, and Thomas  Bøhn
Ecotoxicology. 2013 March; 22(2): 251–262
Open  access:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572389/

Abstract
Low  levels of glyphosate based herbicide induced significant negative 
effects on  the aquatic invertebrate Daphnia magna. Glyphosate herbicides such 
as brands  of Roundup, are known to be toxic to daphnids. However, published 
findings on  acute toxicity show significant discrepancies and variation 
across several  orders of magnitude. To test the acute effects of both 
glyphosate and a  commercial formulation of Roundup (hereafter Roundup), we 
conducted a series  of exposure experiments with different clones and age-classes of 
D. magna. The  results demonstrated EC50 (48) values in the low ppm-range 
for Roundup as well  as for the active ingredient (a.i.) isopropylamine salt 
of glyphosate  (glyphosate IPA) alone. Roundup showed slightly lower acute 
toxicity than  glyphosate IPA alone, i.e. EC50 values of 3.7–10.6 mg a.i./l, 
as compared to  1.4–7.2 mg a.i./l for glyphosate IPA. However, in chronic 
toxicity tests  spanning the whole life-cycle, Roundup was more toxic. D. 
magna was exposed to  sublethal nominal concentrations of 0.05, 0.15, 0.45, 1.35 
and 4.05 mg a.i./l  for 55 days. Significant reduction of juvenile size was 
observed even in the  lowest test concentrations of 0.05 mg a.i./l, for 
both glyphosate and Roundup.  At 0.45 mg a.i./l, growth, fecundity and abortion 
rate was affected, but only  in animals exposed to Roundup. At 1.35 and 
4.05 mg a.i./l of both glyphosate  and Roundup, significant negative effects 
were seen on most tested parameters,  including mortality. D. magna was 
adversely affected by a near 100% abortion  rate of eggs and embryonic stages at 
1.35 mg a.i./l of Roundup. The results  indicate that aquatic invertebrate 
ecology can be adversely affected by  relevant ambient concentrations of this 
major herbicide. We conclude that  glyphosate and Roundup toxicity to 
aquatic invertebrates have been  underestimated and that current European 
Commission and US EPA toxicity  classification of these chemicals need to be  
revised.
==============================================
You received  this email because you signed up for a GMWatch Review or 
Daily  List

Unsubscribe [log in to unmask] from this  list:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&
id=151eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e&c=917f786489

Forward  this email to a  friend:
http://us6.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=917
f786489&e=ec3824c80e

Update  your  profile:
http://gmwatch.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=29cbc7e6c21e0a8fd2a82aeb8&id=15
1eeeb338&e=ec3824c80e

_____________________________________________________
Iowa  Native Plants Mailing  List
[log in to unmask]
http://www.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm

The  Iowa Native Plants Mailing List provides a forum for those interested 
in  Iowa's natural
vegetation and in general conservation issues.  Another  objective is to 
promote the Iowa
Native Plant Society.  This list is  owned and managed by Diana Horton, and 
sponsored by
the University of Iowa  Department of Biology.

For assistance, contact Diana Horton,  [log in to unmask]



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp