Farm subsidies are currently tied to conservation  requirements, but the 
requirements aren't even nearly what is  needed if we want to achieve clean 
water.  The big  question that is oddly absent from most of the mainstream 
media  coverage of the new Farm Bill is whether the (very  lucrative) crop 
insurance that is proposed to replace  subsidies will have any conservation 
requirements at all.  
 
Whether crop insurance will be tied to conservation  compliance is 
currently up to the Farm Bill conference  committee.  Unfortunately, it seems 
possible that in return  for more funding for food assistance, among other things, 
conservation  compliance could get thrown under the bus.   I know  that 
some people in NRCS are terrified of that  possibility.   Crop insurance with 
no compliance would be the end  of the only small stick they've got, and 
carrots are in short  supply.  
 
Cindy
 
Cindy  Hildebrand
[log in to unmask]
Ames, IA 50010

"What does autumn go  on paying for
with so much yellow money?” (Pablo Neruda)  

 
In a message dated 10/14/2013 9:19:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Just a  thought for conversation….

Maybe the crop subsidies prop up a system  that would otherwise collapse 
further upon Iowa rural humans?  (We can't  say "people" anymore, can we?)  If 
the Cato Institute is trashing the  subsidies, I almost think there might 
be something in there for the humans  after all.  Iowa farmers may be those 
"middle-size farms" that would  suffer from sudden dramatic shifts in 
subsidies -- and just killing the  subsidies would make the shift likely be towards 
more industrial rather than  less.

Tie the subsidies to conservation practices, hold Obama to his  promise to 
use antitrust authority for fair and open markets for livestock,  new 
subsidies for beginning farmers and local organic -- but be cautious of  taking a 
"safety net" away from Iowa rural  humans?


Donna



On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:26 AM, renata  sack <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Yes, Bill Leonard's  article is super good!
> 
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 6:18 AM,  [log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
>> Article Title:  Iowa View: State has turned into a 'toilet' for 
industrial ag
>>  
>> 
>> To view the contents on www.desmoinesregister.com,  go to:  
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/201310140405/OPINION01/310140
043
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Message:Check  out this great article "Iowa View: State has turned into 
a "toilet" for  industrial ag  how true.
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> To unsubscribe from the  IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>>  [log in to unmask]
>> 
>>  Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
>>  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
>> 
>> To view the  Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
>>  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
>> 
> 
> - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To  unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
>  [log in to unmask]
> 
> Check out  our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
>  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
> 
> To view the Sierra  Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
>  http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
> 

- - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the  IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message  to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our  Listserv Lists support site for more  information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the  Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions,  see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the IOWA-TOPICS list, send any message to:
[log in to unmask]

Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
 http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp